Would families face a £2,000 tax rise under Labour?

The Conservative claim that a Labour government would mean a £2,000 tax rise for every working family has dominated the General Election news agenda since the first TV debate on Tuesday.

The Prime Minister Rishi Sunak claimed that Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer “would put up everyone’s taxes by £2,000” and that a Labour government would mean “£2,000 higher taxes for every working family”. Mr Starmer described this as “absolute garbage”.

The £2,000 figure, which is a cumulative estimate of how much more families would be taxed over the next four years, is unreliable and based on a number of assumptions.

It comes from a Conservative calculation of Labour’s “unfunded spending commitments”, but many of the costings behind it are uncertain. Even if the figure was right, we can’t be certain this money would be collected by raising taxes, and if it was, families are unlikely to be affected equally.

Row over Treasury costings

The source of the Conservatives’ figure has also been in the spotlight, after Mr Sunak claimed in Tuesday’s TV debate that “independent Treasury officials have costed Labour’s policies and they amount to a £2,000 tax rise”.

That’s not entirely accurate.

Many of the figures used in the Conservatives’ estimate do come from Treasury costings of opposition policies that were published earlier this year. But some of the figures in the document come from other sources, and the Treasury was not involved in calculating the total figure.

The Permanent Secretary for HM Treasury, James Bowler, wrote in a letter to Labour’s Darren Jones on June 3 that “civil servants were not involved in the production or presentation of the Conservative party’s document ‘Labour’s Tax Rises’ or in the calculation of the total figure used”.

It’s also worth noting that many Treasury costings of opposition policies rely on assumptions from special advisors, who are political appointees not civil servants.

Renewable energy in Scotland

The Scottish National Party’s Kate Forbes, the Deputy First Minister of Scotland, told Sky News last week that “last year over 100% of [Scotland’s] electricity needs came from renewables because of what the SNP has been doing”.

That’s true in a way, but it might mislead some people into thinking that Scotland doesn’t use any fossil fuels for electricity. It does.

Scotland does generate more renewable electricity than all the electricity it uses, but much of that renewable power is exported. Scotland still gets about a third of the electricity it actually consumes from fossil fuels and nuclear.

Full Fact is an independent UK charity. Its team of fact checkers and campaigners work to find, expose and counter the harms of bad information.

Election Check 24